Klein v. Schneiderman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 11, 1977, denying defendants’ motion to compel a further deposition of plaintiff on the subject of whether or not she used certain drugs on and prior to the date of the accident or, in the alternative, dismissing her complaint, unanimously dismissed. Respondent shall recover of appellants $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. In effect, the defendants’ application is one seeking rulings upon an examination before trial. They have "short-circuited” the procedure outlined in Tri-State Pipe Lines Corp. v Sinclair Reñning…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tri-State Pipe Lines Corp. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Leel. v. Chemway Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Tri-State Pipe Lines Corp. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sainz v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Siegal v. ArnaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Spatz v. Wide World Travel Service Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- New England Mutual Life Insurance v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Scott v. Vassar Bros. HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.