Legal Opinion
Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. Boldface Licensing + Branding, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 18, 2017No. 15-15060PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ED CARNES, Chief Judge:
Kimberly, Kourtney, and Khloe Kardas-hian appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration of Kro-ma Makeup, EU’s claims against them for cosmetics trademark infringement. At first blush, the issue appears to require application of Florida’s doctrine of equitable es-toppel under which a party to an agreement who relies on it in a dispute with a non-party can be required by that non-party to comply with other terms of the agreement, including the arbitration clause. But there is a wrinkle in this case: the arbitration clause which the non-party to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Leonard J. Klay v. AllCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Barbara Elizabeth Lawson v. Life of the South Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Advanced Bodycare Solutions, LLC v. Thione International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- MS Dealer Service Corp. v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Wilson v. WillisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
- Carmen Lamonaco v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
- Beck Auto Sales, Inc. v. Asbury Jax Ford, LLC, and Lisa MarascoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Michael Lavigne v. Mark AddyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Michael Reiterman v. Farah Ali AbidCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.