Moore v. State

Carley, Chief Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of burglary. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered on *811the jury’s verdict.

Appellant enumerates the general grounds, urging that the evidence was entirely circumstantial and did not exclude every hypothesis save that of his guilt. A review of the transcript shows the following: The burglary occurred at an apartment and the burglar’s apparent point of entry and exit was a bedroom window. A resident of the apartment testified that the window was normally closed and locked. She also testified that…