Legal Opinion

Hilde v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 17, 1990No. 1 CA-UB 90-005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLABORNE, Presiding Judge.

This case involves an application for appeal to review a decision denying unemployment benefits to the appellant. We usually dispose of these applications by unpublished order. We now believe that the decision in Lane v. Arizona Dept. of Economic Sec., 161 Ariz. 581, 780 P.2d 414 (App.1989), was incorrect. 1 Accordingly, we publish this disposition.

Appellant Hilde timely requested a review of an adverse decision by the appeals board. Her written request set forth her reasons why she was aggrieved, but it did not contain “citations to the record, rules and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Vickers v. Western Electric CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re the Appeal in Yuma County, Juvenile Action Nos. J-81-339 & J-81-340Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Lane v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bruch v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Maldonado v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Cummins v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Maldonado v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API