Indust. Comm. v. Franken

It is the claim of counsel for plaintiff in error that the record does not support the verdict and judgment in that it does not disclose that decedent suffered any injury on April 3, 1931, which had causal connection with his death; that on the contrary the heart disease which produced death was in all probability the result of regular and continuous strain on the heart incident to decedent’s daily empolyment; and no witness is offered who saw any occurrence at the plant from which it may be inferred that Mr. Franken was injured. That he did suffer from some cause requiring him to leave his…