Lenon v. Tunnah
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Wood, J:
It is conceded by counsel for the appellees that counsel for the appellants “have given a fairly good statement” of the facts of this record as follows: “On November 9, 1925, under the provisions of Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 5733, there was filed with the city council of Little Bock a petition representing the signers to be owners of a majority in value of real estate within the territory affected for the annexation of such'territory to Street Improvement District No. 363 of Little Rock. The purpose of the petition was to drain, grade, pave, curb and gutter .streets hereinafter more…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Little Rock v. BoulliounSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Knowlton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934