Legal Opinion

Salazar v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of Colorado

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 2000No. 99CA0895PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

The sole issue in this case is whether a workers' compensation claimant who receives permanent total disability (PTD) benefits at the maximum capped rate, as set forth in §§ 8-42-105(1) and 8-42-111(1), C.R.S.1999, is also entitled to the cost of living adjustment (COLA) provided by § 8-42-111(4), C.R.S$.1999. Because we conclude that the COLA adjustment is not subject to the benefit cap, we therefore set aside the order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) denying Frank J. Salazar (claimant) increased PTD benefits and remand to the panel to order that claimant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kraus v. Artcraft Sign Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Snyder Oil Co. v. EmbreeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Mountain City Meat Co. v. OquedaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Henderson v. RSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Sears v. Penrose HospitalColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Berg v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Leprino Foods Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Deutsch v. KalcevicColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. EZ Building Components Mfg., LLC v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Devora v. StrodtmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API