Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant failed to object during most of the prosecutor’s cross-examination of him and thus his argument that the prosecutor improperly conducted her questioning is largely unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). To the extent that this issue is preserved, it is without merit. The defendant also contends that during her summation the prosecutor, inter alia, improperly vouched for her witnesses and shifted the burden of proof. However, inasmuch as the defendant failed to object to any portion of the prosecutor’s summation and/or seek a mistrial at the conclusion thereof,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BruenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. RavenellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. People v. ChellelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. People v. AcevedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. People v. HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API