Legal Opinion

McMurtray v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1942No. 30498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred as as defendant, to recover the sum of $2,543.40 and to have a lien for said amount impressed upon the one-half interest of the defendant in a certain tract of land which had been purchased by the parties on May 13, 1921.

The issues drawn by the pleadings of the respective parties were whether they were partners or joint adventurers in the transaction here involved, and if the latter, then what amount, if any, plaintiff was entitled to have charged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. McCoy v. First Nat. Bank of ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Foster v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. ShirleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darrell D. Parks, Carl T. Ramsey and Phillips Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. Riverside Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  2. Busboom v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Standring v. StandringColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API