Jorge v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Wallach, J. (dissenting).
I would affirm the judgment appealed from. Before invoking the toll provided by the "continuous treatment” rule to salvage this otherwise time-barred medical malpractice action, the law requires us to examine the nature of the "treatment” and to whom it was rendered. And unless, under CPLR 214-a (the codification of the continu*654ous treatment rule first enunciated in Borgia v City of New York, 12 NY2d 151) "there is continuous treatment for the same illness, injury or condition which gave rise to the said act, omission or failure [constituting malpractice]” the toll is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Rizk v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Delaney v. MuscilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Rodriguez v. Manhattan Medical Group, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.