Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jorge v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 1991Published

1Dissent

Wallach, J. (dissenting).

I would affirm the judgment appealed from. Before invoking the toll provided by the "continuous treatment” rule to salvage this otherwise time-barred medical malpractice action, the law requires us to examine the nature of the "treatment” and to whom it was rendered. And unless, under CPLR 214-a (the codification of the continu*654ous treatment rule first enunciated in Borgia v City of New York, 12 NY2d 151) "there is continuous treatment for the same illness, injury or condition which gave rise to the said act, omission or failure [constituting malpractice]” the toll is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Rizk v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Delaney v. MuscilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Rodriguez v. Manhattan Medical Group, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API