Legal Opinion

Cundy v. City of Smyrna

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 3, 2003No. A03A2225PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

Rosemary Cundy appeals from the grant of partial summary judgment on her tort claims against the City of Smyrna. We find that, because the record shows that Cundy failed to give timely written ante litem notice to the city as a matter of law, the trial court properly granted summary judgment on these claims.

The record shows the following undisputed facts: the claims at issue arose from flooding of Cundy’s home when a sewer backed up in October 1999. Over 16 months later, in March 2001, her home was again flooded under similar circumstances. In May 2001, Cundy gave the city…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Chamblee v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Clark v. City of SmyrnaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of ForsythCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. City of Roswell v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Wright v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API