Legal Opinion
Heslin-Kim v. CIGNA Group Insurance
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 22, 2005No. C.A. 9:04-23197-23PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DUFFY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon Defendant’s motion for partial summary adjudication. In its motion, Defendant seeks a decision from this court as to whether the law of Georgia or South Carolina will apply in this insurance coverage dispute. For the reasons set forth herein, the court denies Defendant’s motion for a partial summary adjudication that Georgia law governs the insurance contract. South Carolina law will be applied to this dispute.
BACKGROUND
On November 4, 2004, Plaintiff Keron Heslin-Kim (“Heslin-Kim”) filed a complaint against Connecticut General…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Campbell v. Sonat Offshore Drilling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- David H. Hillman Suzanne Hillman v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Boardman Petroleum, Inc. v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Russell v. McGrathDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Whitt v. WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
- Gonzalez-Lopez v. Cigna Group InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. LewisDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- American Service Insurance Company v. OnTime Transport LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019