Legal Opinion
State v. Ivanhoe
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 6, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 88-1319PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether a sole proprietorship is an enterprise with which its proprietor can associate within the meaning of section 13-2312.B of Arizona’s racketeering act, A.R.S. §§ 13-2301 through -2317 (the racketeering act).
I
Appellee Jeff Ivanhoe (defendant) was charged by indictment with one count of illegal control of an enterprise. See A.R.S. § 13-2312.B. Count one of the indictment alleged:
Between April 18, 1988 and April 27, 1988, JEFF M. IVANHOE, associated with an enterprise, to-wit: “Proud Video”, knowingly conducted or participated in the conduct…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richard D. BENNETT and Carole A. Bennett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. HehlenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Pinkerton's, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Hannosh v. SegalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Castle v. Barrett-Jackson Auction Co., LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.