Legal Opinion
Batiste v. Hopeman Bros., Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1987No. CA-7199PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
508 So.2d 922 (1987)
Freddie BATISTE
v.
HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., et al.
No. CA-7199.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
June 3, 1987.
Frank A. Bruno, Bruno & Bruno, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant Freddie Batiste.
Geoffrey P. Snodgrass, Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees Hopeman Bros., Inc. and Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
Before SCHOTT, KLEES and LOBRANO, JJ.
KLEES, Judge.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a workmen's compensation suit, Freddie Batiste, from a judgment awarding him supplemental earnings benefits and denying his request for attorney's fees. We…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New Orleans (Gulfwide) Stevedores v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Sherman v. Cabildo Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
3Cited by17 opinions
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Romero v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Culotta v. Great Atlantic & Pacific TeaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.