Hartline v. Hartline

OPINION

By EMMONS, J.

This matter is before the Court on a motion for contempt by the plaintiff for failing to pay support money as agreed upon by the plaintiff and ordered by the Court, as well as a motion to reduce the unpaid monthly support moneys to a lump sum judgment, and also a motion for modification of the agreement entered into by and between the plaintiff and defendant, which agreement was made a part of the divorce decree and provided for the support of Ronnie Lloyd Hartline in the sum of $50 per month.

The facts of the case are as follows: The plaintiff and defendant were married in…