Legal Opinion

Watson v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 16, 1935No. 4-4199PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

Drainage District No. 18 of Craig-head County, Arkansas, was created by order of the county court of said county in the year 1918 as a drainage district under Act 279 of the Acts of 1909, and the acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, commonly referred to as the Alternative System Drainage Law.

H. B. Watson, P. W. Lutterloh and F. E. Miller are the commissioners of said district. The district embraces a large acreage, and the assessments levied aggregate $763,650.87. The district sold bonds in denominations of $1,000 each, bearing interest at a rate of five per cent, per annum,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Crowe v. Security Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Oliver v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Murphy v. CherrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Myers v. RolfeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eddy v. SchumanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Miller v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. State National Bank v. MorthlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Douglas v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Bishop v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API