Legal Opinion
Jorden v. Mee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 14, 1935No. 24510PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Before disposing of this cause upon the merits, there are two motions respecting the bond superseding the judgment. One, a motion to set aside a former order; the other a motion to refer. Since the case now arises upon the merits, it will not be necessary to pass upon these motions other than to overrule them, and in order to hear the cause upon the merits, they are hereby overruled.
The plaintiffs in error were defendants' in .the trial court and the defendant in error was plaintiff, and will be so referred to in this opinion.
On the 5th day of October, 1931, a judgment was regularly entered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First National Bank of Tulsa v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- McLaughlin v. Houston-Hudson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Lawton Mill & Elevator Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Nisbet v. Great Northern Clay Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Fernow v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilmarth v. HeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Streets v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Schave v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939