Legal Opinion
Pereira v. Administrator
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 1, 1986No. 3524PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendant, Naugatuck Glass Company (Naugatuck Glass) is appealing from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing its appeals from decisions of the employment security board of review.
The claimants, Deolinda B. Pereira, Victor P. Simoes and Joaguim Maceira,1 were employed by Naugatuck Glass, and each left their jobs to accept employment elsewhere for higher wages. Subsequently, all three were laid off by their new employers and each filed claims for unemployment benefits with the defendant, the administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act (administrator). All three were found…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Valley Surgical Group, P.C. v. AdministratorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Foley v. Administrator, No. Cv94 0542297 (May 21, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Kernicky v. Administrator, No. Cv 90-0267503 S (Jun. 25, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Pereira v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000