Legal Opinion

People v. Polanco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises out of an undercover "buy and bust” operation, pursuant to which defendant and three others were *532indicted on February 22, 1989. The facts surrounding the actual drug sale to undercover Officer Michael Blake, which are detailed in the dissent, are undisputed. Defendant contends, however, that he was not among the group of men present in Apartment 2F of 596 Riverside Drive in Manhattan when Blake purchased a gram of crack cocaine in exchange for $25 of pre-recorded "buy” money, but was apprehended by members of the backup team as he was leaving after merely delivering food.

In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BenitezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. PolancoNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. PachecoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. DerosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API