Legal Opinion
Bahraini v. Jin Chen
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 11, 2021No. 2:18-cv-03261Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONA BAHRAINI, No. 2:18-cv-03261-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JIN CHEN and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Jin Chen’s (“Chen”) Motion to Remand.1 19 (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff Mona Bahraini (“Plaintiff”) filed a Statement of Non-Opposition to 20 Defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 17.) Having carefully considered the briefing filed by both 21 parties, the Court hereby GRANTS Chen’s Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 15.) 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Solomon Lew v. Stanton Moss and Harlean MossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.