Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1960No. 35259PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

— October 3, 1958, Francis A. Johnson was charged by an amended information with thirty-six counts of uttering a forged instrument, and with twenty-eight counts of grand larceny by false representations. The charging portion for each count of the two crimes was identical, except as to names and amounts involved, and was as follows:

“I, Charles O. Carroll, Prosecuting Attorney in and for the County of King, State of Washington, ... by this Amended Information do accuse Francis A. Johnson of the crime of Grand Larceny, committed as follows:
“He, the said Francis A. Johnson, and Robert E. Haber,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. SaffordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. State v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API