Legal Opinion · Dissent

Appeal of Letellier

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 15, 2011No. 2010-795Published

1DissentDalianis, C.J.

The majority holds that the cumulative occupational stress and depression suffered by the petitioner, Raymond Letellier (claimant), constitutes a “mental injury” that is not compensable because it results from a personnel action “taken in good faith” against the claimant “by an employer.” RSA 281-A:2, XI (2010). Because I disagree with this conclusion, I, respectfully, dissent.

The following facts appear in the record. The claimant, who has a history of depression, is the co-founder and former operations officer of respondent Steelelements, Inc. (Steelelements). I will refer to Steelelements…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bean v. Red Oak Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. Union Leader Corp. v. FennimanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Appeal of GamasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. Hampton Police Ass'n v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  5. Appeal of MargesonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API