Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Carter Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 30, 1954No. 4801Published
1ConcurrencePhillips, Chief Judge
I fully concur in the opinion of Judge MURRAH. However, I desire to state what appear to me to be additional reasons for holding that the deeds in Magnolia’s chain of title were valid against and binding upon the Commissioners of the Land Office,1 and an alternative reason for holding that Magnolia was a *7“record owner” within the meaning of § 5492 Okl.Stat.1931 and entitled to be given the notice provided for in § 5491 Okl.Stat.1931.
Magnolia delivered to the Commissioners the original and one copy of each of the several deeds in its chain of title and the filing fees for recording them in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stevens v. PattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Johnson v. FARMER'S UNION CO-OP. ROYALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Berryman v. Producers Corp. of NevadaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- First Nat. Bank of Butler v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- State v. Red River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.