Cajun Welding & Machine Co. v. Deville
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
hAMY, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation matter, the employer and its insurer filed a disputed claim, contesting the necessity of a motorized scooter as palliative treatment for an employee injured in the course and scope of his employment. The workers’ *876compensation judge determined that the scooter was a medical necessity to which the employee-claimant was entitled. The employer and its insurer filed the instant appeal. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The claimant, Travis Deville, asserts that on February 25, 1999, he sustained an injury to his back…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & GraniteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Fritz v. Home Furniture-LafayetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Alleman v. Fruit of the Loom-CrowleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Ferrier v. Jordache-Ditto'sLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Easton Pharmacy, Inc. v. BullerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cross v. Slayter Trucking CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- David Paul Cross v. Slayter Trucking Companies, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Easton Pharmacy, Inc. v. Kelli BullerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011