Legal Opinion
State v. Haste
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided March 2, 1993No. 91-2036-CR, 91-2851-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.
Vernon Haste appeals his convictions for battery to a peace officer and resisting an officer. Haste argues that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel at the trial and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel at the sentencing. Because we conclude that Haste did not waive counsel, but was denied counsel throughout his trial and sentencing, we conclude that Haste was denied his due process right of representation. Therefore, we reverse.
I. Background
A. Preliminary Proceedings
On November 29, 1989, Vernon Haste was tried before a jury on charges of battery to a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- State v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- State v. DivanovicCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- State v. KlessigCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.