Legal Opinion

State v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1967No. 44,572PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

The defendant, Maceo Freeman, Jr., was convicted of robbery in the first degree in violation of K. S. A. 21-527.

The defendant was tried on charges of forcible rape under K. S. A. 21-424 and robbery in the first degree. The jury found defendant guilty on the robbery charge and not guilty of rape. Defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled and he perfected this appeal.

Defendant was represented by court-appointed counsel during all proceedings in the district court. Present counsel was appointed to represent defendant in this appeal.

Defendant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. State v. OsburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Hale v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. State v. HoblSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. State v. BeachSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. State v. WiseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  4. State v. BookerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API