Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Dehart (In Re Caruso)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 2010No. 5-08-BK-50972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1

ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Procedural History

On March 22, 2010, the Debtor, Ralph Caruso (“Caruso”), filed the Debtor’s Motion to Amend Chapter 13 Plan After Confirmation (“Motion”) and also filed a plan with the proposed modifications. The Chapter 13 Trustee (“Trustee”) objected to the Motion and the proposed plan. After a hearing, the parties were instructed to file briefs to support their positions. As both briefs have been filed, this matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons set forth below, the Trustee’s objection is overruled and the Modified Plan is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. In Re DennisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  5. In Re BaldridgeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeHart v. Eckert (In re Eckert)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API