Legal Opinion

Malone v. Rainey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1939No. Motion No. 14184PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM :

This motion to file petition for mandamus. The petition accompanies the motion. The petition discloses that James L. Malone, as relator, seeks to have this Court, as a court of original jurisdiction, issue a mandamus against the President, the Auditor, and the Board of Regents of the University of Texas compelling them to permit relator to enter the University as a student for the semester beginning September 21, 1939, without paying a fee of $1.00, known as the “Union Fee.” It is alleged that such fee is collected for the benefit of Texas Union, and Texas Union is also named as…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rainey v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston v. Babb, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
  3. Ex parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. McLarty v. BoltonTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Glenn v. Industrial Accident BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API