Legal Opinion
Huston v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1985No. Nos. 84-1084, 84-1361PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
These direct appeals from two decisions of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) are brought under the Bank Holding Company Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1841-50 (the Act), by the Superintendent of Banking for the State of Iowa. Although the appeals involve separate factual situations, they have been consolidated for purposes of today’s decision, because they involve similar issues as to the extent of the Board’s responsibilities under § 3(d) of the Act (the so-called “Douglas Amendment,” . 12 U.S.C. § 1842(d)) for regulating interstate expansion of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. First Lincolnwood Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marshall & Ilsley Corporation v. John G. Heimann, Comptroller of the Currency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Iowa Independent Bankers, an Iowa Nonprofit Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Northwest Bancorporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas H. Huston, as Superintendent of Banking, State of Iowa v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Intervenor (Ksad, Inc.) for Thomas H. Huston, as Superintendent of Banking, State of Iowa v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Intervenors (Banks of Iowa, Inc. First Bank System, Inc.) ForCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985