Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Sorensen v. Mitchell Irrigation District
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 1935No. 29522PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
In 1931, on request of the governor, the attorney general instituted this action, to compel defendant to comply with the laws of the state of Nebraska applicable to irrigation districts in this state, and to enjoin defendant from using any water from the North Platte river for irrigation purposes until it complied with such laws, and for other equitable relief. Plaintiff alleged that defendant has *588hitherto failed and refused to comply with any of the laws of the state of Nebraska regulating the use of water from Nebraska streams for purposes of irrigation in Nebraska.
The Farmers Irrigation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. San Jacinto Tin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Attorney General v. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Consumers Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- United States v. TilleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Mitchell Irr. Dirstrict v. WhitingWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Shearer v. BrumbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.