Legal Opinion

Naef v. Miller-Goll Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 20, 1932No. 31804PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiff sought to háve a receiver appointed for defendant, but was unsuccessful. See 174 La. 232, 140 So. 32.

Thereafter defendant took a rule in the court below to have its costs taxed, including “reasonable counsel fees and other reasonable expenses” in accordance with section 2 of Act -No. 159 of 1898, as amended by Act No. 117 of 1916.

The total amount claimed in the rule was $1,918.50; the trial judge allowed $1,768.50; and plaintiff appealed to this court to which the original appeal belonged.

The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the amount involved is below the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barker v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. Judges Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. In re Petit & Boh Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Naef v. Miller-Goll Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  5. Denegre v. W. G. Tebault Furniture & Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jiles v. Venus Community Benev. Aid Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Vives v. VivesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API