Legal Opinion · Dissent

People ex rel. Hoffman v. Rupp

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Dissenting opinion. For majority opinion, see 35 IT. Y. Supp. 349.

1DissentWard, J.

It became the duty of the respondents, the board of police of the city of Buffalo, to appoint an assistant sealer of weights and measures for said city. The salary of an assistant is $1,000 a year. The duties of such officer are to test all scales and measures used for the sale or weighing of commodities within the city, and to collect fees therefor, and to report all violations of the ordinances on the subject to the law department of the city for prosecution. While a vacancy existed in that office, the relator, Charles Hoffman, a resident of said city, presented a written application to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Wren v. . GoettingNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Hoffman v. RuppNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API