Winters v. State

The information charged that on October 9, 1924, one Jake Winters did sell to B. E. Slagle, one pint of whisky. On the trial the jury returned a verdict finding him guilty and leaving the punishment to be fixed by the" court. Motion for new trial was duly filed and overruled. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals.

The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, and rulings of the court in admitting incompetent and hearsay evidence over defendant’s objections.

This is a companion case to that of Luck v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 322, 260 P. 1118.

Asid…