Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1955No. Cr. Nos. 12327, 12342PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

This petition for habeas corpus is premised upon the thesis that the court illegally increased petitioner’s sentence.

The petition is loosely drawn without aid of counsel. In view of the fact that petitioner is confined outside the limits of the Western District, and that the United States District Court in New. Haven, Connecticut, relegated petitioner for relief to this district, I shall treat the petition as a motion to vacate and set aside judgment and sentence. 28. U.S.C.A. § 2255.

Relief under the statutory section invoked may be granted where it appears that there has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  4. United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. LydickDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1959
  2. Copley v. SweetDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1955
  3. Smith v. JenningsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API