Legal Opinion

Mohr v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 9, 1929No. 3099PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatfield, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court in reappraisements 49576-A and 49577-A. The merchandise consists of binoculars imported into the United States from Germany.

In reappraisement 49576-A the binoculars were entered at $7 each, plus a luxury tax of 15 per centum. They were appraised at $11 each. In reappraisement 49577-A binoculars imported at a later date were entered at $11 each, to meet advances in the case then pending, reap-praisement 49576-A, and appraised at the entered value.

The trial justice held that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. WienerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luigi Vitelli Elvea, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. United States v. Baar & Beards, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Baar & Beards, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Baar & Beards, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  5. United States v. Semon Bache & Co.United States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API