Legal Opinion

City of Aurora v. Pennington

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court of the Second District; the Hon. Joseph Sibley, presiding Justice, and the Hon. E. S. Leland and Hon. Nathaniel Pillsbury, Justices.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This action was brought by Matilda Pennington, against the -city of Aurora, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by falling, in consequence of a defective sidewalk over which she was passing. On the trial in the circuit court plaintiff recovered a judgment for $2000, and on defendant’s appeal it was affirmed in the Appellate Court. That court found, and so certified to this court, “that the allegations in plaintiff’s declaration, and the fact that plaintiff exercised ordinary care, were sufficiently proved to authorize the verdict of the jury.” As that finding under our statute…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tenney v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. City of Joliet v. SewardIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API