Legal Opinion

In RE McCLINTOCK v. Rhay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1958No. 34722PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

52 Wn.2d 615 (1958)

328 P.2d 369

In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of TRUMAN WILSON McCLINTOCK, Petitioner,

v.

B.J. RHAY, as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.[1]

No. 34722.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

July 17, 1958.

Truman Wilson McClintock, pro se.

The Attorney General and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus, prosecuted in forma pauperis.

Petitioner was charged, on September 11, 1957, in the superior court for Grant county, with the crime of forgery in the first…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of McClintock v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1958

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In RE MEMPA v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In RE MEMPA v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In RE MEMPA v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API