Legal Opinion

In re Haverly

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

While petitioner was a resident of New York in 1935 she went to Mexico on a vacation. She had no intention of living permanently in that country, and stayed there about three months. While there she divorced her husband on the ground of incompatibility. The husband was not a resident of Mexico and was not before the court there, but appeared by an attorney. The petitioner remarried in New Jersey later in 1935. Neither the courts in New Jersey nor those in New York recognize the validity of the Mexican judgment since the petitioner had not in fact become a resident of Mexico. The courts of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Petition of R____District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944
  2. Petition of LiebermanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1943
  3. In re BarugDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API