Legal Opinion
Friedman v. INTERVET INC.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 6, 2010No. Case 3:09CV2945PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, District Judge.
This is a products liability suit by a pet owner, Lawrence Friedman, who claims his pet died from proprietary veterinary insulin (Vetsulin) manufactured by defendant Intervet Inc. d/b/a Intervet/Schering-Plough Animal Health (Intervet).
Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Pending is plaintiffs motion for an Order: 1) preventing defendant from providing “misleading communications” to prospective class members; and 2) rescinding all settlement agreements obtained thus far with prospective class members. [Doc. 6].
For the reasons discussed below,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Jackson v. Motel 6 Multipurpose, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Freddie Richardson v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reid v. Unilever United States, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- F.G. v. CooperSurgical, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Infinium Builders LLC v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Morrison v. Columbus Family Health Care LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Odom Sports Medicine P.A. v. UnitedHealth Group IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.