Parks v. Eames Realty Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
Since there is ample evidence to support the decree of the Trial Court and no error of law appears therein, it is unnecessary to consider what, if any, questions of law are raised by the general exception. Eastman v. Waisman, ante, 253.
The original contract called for $500 down, the assumption of a mortgage for $2,950 and the payment of $3,550 in installments of $500 each on August 15 and October 1, 1944, and each year thereafter, with interest as stipulated. It was provided that default in any installment or interest should render the entire amount due and payable at once without notice. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tough v. NetschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sawin v. CarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Wiggin v. PeacockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
- Dandeneau v. SeymourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Cadorette v. LevesqueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949