Muessig v. Muessig
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellant, Julia Muessig, and respondent, Michael Muessig, are the Estate of Regli’s only remaining potential beneficiaries. They have filed a motion seeking a “stipulated partial reversal” of several probate court orders. Because this request does not meet either the statutory guidelines set out in Code of Civil Procedure, section 128, subdivision (a)(8),1 or rule 8 of this court’s local rules, the motion is denied.
*880II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On October 29, 2003, the probate court issued an order settling the final account of David Hitchcock, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lazzarone v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Union Bank of California v. Braille Institute of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Estate of RegliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004