Legal Opinion

Mullins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1923No. 7239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Van Zandt County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The indictment is sufficient. It need not allege that such manufacture was for purposes of sale. Stringer v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 46, 241 S. W. Rep., 159. Under the present liquor law the exceptions named in the statute need not be negatived in the indictment. Crowley v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 103, 242 S. W. Rep., 472. An indictment similar in form and charging the sale of spirituous and vinous and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crowley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Stringer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boortz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Mayfield v. SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API