Camp v. Milam
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
Rehearing denied May 10, 1973. All the Justices concurring except Coleman, J., dissenting.
2DissentColeman, Justice
On further consideration, I am of opinion that the rehearing should be granted and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
I do not agree that the license to use the lake granted to Milam is irrevocable for the life of Milam or for any other period of time. Rhodes v. Otis, 33 Ala. 578, does not hold that a license granted for a consideration paid by the licensee to licensor must be specifically performed, but Rhodes does hold that if a licensor has granted a license for a…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Wiseman v. . LucksingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- White v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Rhodes v. OtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Woodward v. SeelyIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
- Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.