Legal Opinion

Bush v. E. H. Cottrell, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The information gathered by plaintiffs’ attorney, consisting of statements made by an automobile mechanic who examined a ear owned by one of the plaintiffs, is material prepared for litigation. However, since it can no longer be duplicated and withholding it would result in injustice or undue hardship to the defendant, the plaintiffs should be required to produce it. (CPLR 3101, subd, [d]; cf. Clarke v. First Presbyterian Church of East Aurora, 30 A D 2d 763, Brunswick Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 27 A D 2d 182.)…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morrison v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. FMC Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kellar v. Vassar Bros. HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API