Legal Opinion

Central Iowa Power Cooperative v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 9, 1979No. Nos. 77-1914, 77-1916 and 77-1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by TAMM, Circuit Judge.

TAMM, Circuit Judge:

This case involves challenges to provisions of the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) Agreement. The Federal Power Commission (Commission) found that the membership criteria of the Agreement were discriminatory and ordered modifications.1 The Commission approved the Agreement in all other respects. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the Commission’s decision.

BACKGROUND

In 1972, thirty-one electric power systems signed the MAPP Agreement.2 The original parties to the Agreement were twelve investor-owned utilities,3…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Bancard Corp.(NaBanco) v. VISA USADistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1984
  2. Central Iowa Power Cooperative v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Alexandria Board of Public Works, Minnesota v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Central Iowa Power Cooperative, Intervenors. Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Central Iowa Power Cooperative, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API