Legal Opinion · Dissent

Glens Falls Insurance v. McCown

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1951No. A-2718Published

1DissentJustice Smith

I regret that I must dissent from the view taken by the majority of the Court in the disposition of this case. I will omit a restatement of the facts set out in the majority opinion, but I will add such additional facts as I deem pertinent.

From the evidence taken in the trial of this cause it appears that the respondent relied upon the judgment and advice of a Mr. Turner, an insurance agent of the petitioner, in the selection of the coverage he paid for in the contract of insurance sued upon. He and Mr. Turner were friends and had discussed his need for insurance on his stock of used cars.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCaleb v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. McCownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API