Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Finn
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided August 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Proceedings upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of an administratrix.
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas, S.
—I will find as a matter of fact that the administratrix was the lawful wife of the decedent, and that she is now his widow, and that her former husband died prior.to her marriage with the decedent. The account of the administratrix cannot be surcharged with the sum of $3,154.38 drawn by her from the account in the Bowery Savings Bank in the name of “ James Finn, in trust for Mary Finn, his wife,” or with the sum of $1,097, drawn by her from the account in the Seamen’s Bank for Savings in the name of “ James Finn, in trust for Mary Finn,” for the reason that those sums were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robertson v. McCartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of MuellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Getman v. . Second National Bank of OswegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of WatsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In re the Estate of Mart E.New York Surrogate's Court · 1906
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WhittemoreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919