Witt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant, who had been in the employ of the government at the Pearl Harbor Navy Yard, was convicted of the felonious taking of property of the United States consisting of certain Diesel engine parts stored in a Yard shop.
He claims that error was committed in- several respects. His first complaint is that an agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation was permitted -to remain in the courtroom and to sit at the table with government counsel, notwithstanding appellant had requested -the exclusion of witnesses. The exclusion of witnesses is concededly a matter addressed to the discretion of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Irene Smith Cliett v. Mamie S. HammondsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Peter Postma and Joseph P. McConnon and Nicholas RobilottoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Michael Galgano, United States of America v. Anthony CarminatiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Harkins v. IkedaHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. LeongHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.