Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1950No. 7371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Chief Justice.

Appellant was convicted of involuntary manslaughter arising out of an automobile collision killing a passenger in appellant’s car.

The principal question submitted by appellant upon this appeal is that of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conclusion that appellant was. driving his automobile recklessly, or in a manner evidencing a marked disregard for the safety of others.

There is little or.no controversy between, the parties- as *519to the testimony and evidence in the case. A brief summary of the testimony in the case is:

The complaint arose out of an automobile…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. GroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. ThatcherUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. BleazardUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. GutheilUtah Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BoschMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. RitchieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  3. State v. BoschMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API