State v. Clark
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PRATT, Chief Justice.
Appellant was convicted of involuntary manslaughter arising out of an automobile collision killing a passenger in appellant’s car.
The principal question submitted by appellant upon this appeal is that of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conclusion that appellant was. driving his automobile recklessly, or in a manner evidencing a marked disregard for the safety of others.
There is little or.no controversy between, the parties- as *519to the testimony and evidence in the case. A brief summary of the testimony in the case is:
The complaint arose out of an automobile…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. GroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. ThatcherUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. BleazardUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. GutheilUtah Supreme Court · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BoschMontana Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. RitchieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- State v. BoschMontana Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1950