Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Rubin
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 24, 1982No. [No. 41, September Term, 1981.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRodowsky, J.
This case arises out of a liquidity problem in the administration of the testamentary estate of the founder of a family corporation. In exchange for a note, the personal representatives sold stock from the estate to the issuing corporation, which was controlled by the persons serving as personal representatives, in a transaction designed to qualify under § 303 of the Internal Revenue Code. Because of a conflict of interests the chancellor surcharged the personal representatives on complaint of the petitioner. The Court of Special Appeals reversed. Rubin v. Goldman, 48 Md. App. 59, 426 A.2d…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In re the Accounting of HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,029 Ruth Elizabeth McCormick Tankersley v. Joseph M. P. Albright and Josephine P. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Steele EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Flagg EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Kramme v. MewshawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Buxton v. BuxtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Kann v. KannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- MATTER OF ESTATE OF BODMAN v. BodmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Miller v. McCaskeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.